Is your Mac vulnerable?Key points from Federighi’s testimony in the Apple vs. Epic case | #microsoft | #hacking | #cybersecurity

Is macOS vulnerable to major cybersecurity flaws?Over time, Apple has repeatedly claimed that macOS is a much safer desktop operating system than its main rival, Microsoft Windows, but last night in an ongoing hearing at Apple vs Epic Games. Court struggle, This one particular point has made a surprising refutation and outlook for everyone but Craig Federighi. Apple’s senior vice president of software engineering testified to questions about how Mac and iOS software work, arguing that, importantly, the state of cybersecurity on the Mac is by no means satisfactory. , Cited this as one of the greatest justifications. Why Apple chose to protect the iOS app ecosystem so tightly.

Apple’s “Walled Garden”

A number of times, Apple It has been accused of running a “walled garden”. This is an ecosystem that is too closely protected and managed. This is nothing new. Apple has always envisioned end-to-end control over what it does in the software ecosystem, from apps that open by default to how to download and even set ringtones on your device. This is a lot of criticism, from antitrust developers who blame Apple for reducing unfair revenue from downloads to other services that accuse Apple of having more unjustified prejudice than other services. Is collecting.

Apple keeps iOS “much safer” than its competitors, and the “walled garden” approach shows that it “successfully” did so.

In a hearing last night, Federighi’s statement touched on Android, macOS, iOS, and even standard PCs, justifying how such a strategy worked or didn’t work for Apple. He has adopted the ability to sideload Android and apps. This is highly valued by many developers and allows AOSP-based operating systems to have decentralized, compulsory app services such as: / e / How the OS works.. Federighi described iOS as a “generational opportunity” and said Apple has set out to keep mobile operating systems “much more secure” than its competitors, and next to the so-called “walled garden” approach. Said there are all the signs like. Apple “successfully did so.”

“It’s well understood in the security community that Android has malware issues and iOS has been successful in anticipating malware issues so far,” executives said in court.

Scaling security

At this point, Federighi made a surprising disclosure that the Mac is definitely not safe, at least not as secure as Apple wants. Federighi noted that users could download and install applications from third-party sources on the Mac, which led to a “significantly larger malware problem” on Mac OS than Apple has on iOS. He argued this claim, with macOS having an installed user base about one-tenth that of iOS, and the scale of security concerns Apple may face as a result of supporting third-party app download sites. Claimed to show.

Instead of answering what Apple can do to support an open developer environment, the discussion focused on what it shouldn’t.

Federighi said it was the user’s responsibility to ensure responsible off-road in both the car and the computer, leaving the discussion in the car analogy open, but his argument was clear. The iOS user base is much larger, with an estimated active user base of over 1 billion.This means that if Apple opens the OS to support third-party sites for downloading apps, the OS will Targeted attacker, Regularly Target android Load spyware, stalkerware, adware, ransomware, etc. to your device via unidentified download sources.

To justify this defense, Apple threw Mac security under the bus. This has been an enthusiastic defense for a long time. So, instead of pulling in the question of what Apple can do to support a more competitive and open developer environment, what should executives do to keep their software safer than competitive? We proceeded with the discussion. This discussion has both sides, and while the iPhone has repeatedly proven to be vulnerable to security flaws, the security issues it faces are arguably smaller than those of Android and Windows. is.

Everything that was said

Apple has defended the reasons behind the development of such a tightly protected app environment. PhilSchiller’s recent testimony reveals many important points. Schiller, who has led marketing at Apple for nearly 30 years, said jailbreak raised Apple’s security concerns when users started calling their apps, and then created the App Store as it is known today. Was emphasized.

Schiller talked about tools that Apple built for independent developers, consumer access provided by Apple, and more.

As Epic quoted Steve Jobs’ statement that he wouldn’t make money by selling apps, as Apple claimed to be doing the wrong thing by making as much money as possible, Schiller said Apple Consumer access given to independent developers, and other such factors, defended by talking about all the developer tools they built. He also said he didn’t believe the app market was a duopoly between itself and Google, but this seemed like a sort of spread we were accustomed to at antitrust hearings. ..

One of the key hearings is Apple CEO Tim Cook, who will chair the hearing on Friday, May 21st. Until then, Apple is ready to open locks on macOS, and vice versa. By pushing iOS towards the Mac, Federighi and Apple clearly want to bring macOS closer to iOS.

Read all the latest news, Breaking news And Coronavirus news Here

Is your Mac vulnerable?Key points from Federighi’s testimony in the Apple vs. Epic case

Source link Is your Mac vulnerable?Key points from Federighi’s testimony in the Apple vs. Epic case

Original Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

+ 75 = eighty five