Google is now rolling out the May update to supported Pixels | #firefox | #firefoxsecurity


?

  • Anonymous
  • vIg

Plasma6669999, 3 hours agoLovely machines. Cheap and cheerful build. Sadly sometimes you can feel like an unpaid beta te… more

Cheap and build. Sadly you can feel like an unpaid beta tester

FTFY

?

  • Anonymous
  • vIg

Plasma6669999, 3 hours agoLovely machines. Cheap and cheerful build. Sadly sometimes you can feel like an unpaid beta te… more

Cheap and build. Sadly you can feel like an unpaid beta tester

FTFY

R273

Georgi, 5 hours agoI had Samsung note 7,8 and S20 plus , Sony’s , Lg etc. All of them had useless features. … moreI like the desktop mode in Samsung, LG and Moto phones. Maybe I’ll buy Pixel if it will have one too. Google could buy DeX from Samsung.

P

  • Plasma6669999
  • 39x

Lovely machines. Cheap and cheerful build. Sadly sometimes you can feel like an unpaid beta tester though.

A

  • Anonymous
  • 7tS

Georgi, 4 hours ago5 years ago those ones who had multi window didn’t even get monthly security updates, or … moreWho said u that samsung and sony had useless camera? Their ui were also better than stock android those days

?

  • Anonymous
  • vIg

Georgi, 4 hours agoYeah that’s your phone,so you better throw it in the bin 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Yes Google already in the bin

?

  • Anonymous
  • M0x

Google is old now

352

Anonymous, 4 hours agoA proper camera that’s crushed by a 15 year old $50 dollar pocket camera in video capabil… moreYeah that’s your phone,so you better throw it in the bin 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

?

  • Anonymous
  • vIg

Anonymous, 10 hours agoAnyone know if the pixel UI glitches have been fixed ? when I last owned a pixel 3a xl , espec… moreThose are not bugs those are features.

?

  • Anonymous
  • vIg

Georgi, 4 hours ago5 years ago those ones who had multi window didn’t even get monthly security updates, or … moreA proper camera that’s crushed by a 15 year old $50 dollar pocket camera in video capabilities 🤣🤣🤣

?

  • Anonymous
  • vIg

[deleted post]Million times worst you meant

352

Anonymous, 4 hours ago5 years ago stock android didnt even have multi window bahahaha

now they only just got scre… more
5 years ago those ones who had multi window didn’t even get monthly security updates, or a proper camera hahahaha

?

  • Anonymous
  • TLP

Georgi, 5 hours agoI had Samsung note 7,8 and S20 plus , Sony’s , Lg etc. All of them had useless features. … more5 years ago stock android didnt even have multi window bahahaha

now they only just got screen recording

still no duplicate apps

anything but stock android, even the garbage chinese skins

M

Georgi, 5 hours agoI had Samsung note 7,8 and S20 plus , Sony’s , Lg etc. All of them had useless features. … moreTrue. And only a Google Pixel user will understand that.

352

Anonymous, 10 hours agoLatest update yet no new features.
Stock Android is the worst.
I had Samsung note 7,8 and S20 plus , Sony’s , Lg etc. All of them had useless features. Stock android has the most important features.

S

  • Some dude
  • YYf

*Cries in OnePlus*

R42974

I really like the software support but I don’t like the hardware.

G

  • GooglePinocchio
  • p}2

The most lying and manipulative brand in the world. No, no, no hardware touch issues! It’s a software problem and we will fix it with updates (like the hardware failure of the speakers).

?

  • Anonymous
  • nit

Anonymous, 10 hours agoTotally.. Who wants latest features 10 years late?? Correct

?

  • Anonymous
  • StU

Anyone know if the pixel UI glitches have been fixed ? when I last owned a pixel 3a xl , especially when using googles own apps the UI at the bottom of the screen , where the on screen buttons are, would jump a little , like when using twitter on google chrome, the bottom controls would jump upwards and cause issues with site navigation.

I know they finally fixed the ghost apps, where apps would get stuck in the app switcher….or at least in my experience it was fixed.

but the chrome and general UI glitch just seemed to never go away



Original Source link

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

35 − 31 =