Civil society should be institutionalised by the government | #government | #hacking | #cyberattack


MANY of us are unaware about the Open Government Partnership (OGP) which was launched in 2011 by eight founding governments – Brazil, Indonesia, Philippines, Norway, South Africa, United Kingdom, Mexico and the United States, to provide an international platform and opportunity to generate processes of cooperation between civil society organisations and governments.

Today, 79 countries have taken steps to bring civil society into the effort to improve government performance, secure concrete commitments from the governments to be more open and to foster greater transparency and accountability.

It is also aims to strengthen and improve governance, fight corruption, climate change, improve health, education, harness new technologies and other critical public services and to address old challenges of governance.

The current flood situation in the country shows there was no proper coordination between government agencies and civil society organisations, which caused to a certain extent, delay in helping the flood victims.

A proper coordinated and good smart partnership between both private and government sectors would have improved the delivery system and reduced the damage caused by the disaster.

The OGP is leading by example and assisting civil society to share best practices, bring expert knowledge to bear in government decision-making. They are designed to generate ideas that provide technical assistance to support capacity and institutions.

The OGP presents an opportunity as seen in the Flood Hack event, by using government data to design and create a range of applications to assist with the response and relief efforts to floods, which have affected many areas in the UK.

Data could be used to produce innovative public service, but the main problem is that there is still a reluctance by the government to press with releasing more of it.

Another scenario, the Netherlands also uses big data to improve flood control and management of the entire Dutch water management system. Currently, it maintains one of the most advanced and closely monitored water systems in the world. It has, considering that more than half of the Dutch people live in areas prone to flooding, a history of horrific flooding.

Through OGP, the Philippines used citizen feedback to manage flood control that has paralysed parts of Manila. Adopting the OGP would change the nature and create a more synergistic and formal relationship between the government and the civil society in Malaysia, while allowing the civil society to retain their independence. Both parties could work together to develop a national action plan, and they would partner each other to monitor the implementation too.

One of the founding principles of OGP is that no one institution, government or organisation has a monopoly on good ideas or innovation. The spirit being that all of us have something to share and something to learn.

Open government is not just about allowing individual access to budget execution data; it goes beyond, it is also about ensuring the rendering of accounts by governments, monitoring, oversight and citizen’s participation. It is about establishing a permanent two-way channel for communication between governments and society.

In order to be part of this global community, they have to work in four areas, namely fiscal transparency, access to information, disclosures related to elected and senior public officials, and citizen engagement.

The Malaysian government is already doing well in most of these areas, except to improve the access to information. Signing up would not be an arduous task.

When the government join the partnership, they must endorse the Open Government Declaration and commit to the following principles:

· Promote openness in the availability of information about government activities;

· Engage citizens in decision-making;

· Implement the highest standards of professional integrity through administration;

· Increase access to new technologies for openness and accountability.

The government must be ready to arrange official meetings regularly with the civil society to encourage co-creation of specific reforms, and to build trust between ministers and top civil servants to discuss reforms.

According to Datuk Wan Saiful Wan Jan, the former chief executive of the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs, it is really important that those in government pursue a healthy relationship with groups that can be their “critical friends”.

These are entities that may take an opposing view on certain government policies, but their arguments and criticisms cannot be dismissed lightly because they speak with the authority of knowledge, give reasoned critical and constructive criticism or views, and are not mere rhetoric.

When Francis Maude, the former minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General, discussed public service reform, transparency and a Flood Hack event in UK at an OGP meeting in Dublin, he stated the following:

“The Open Government Partnership, which I’m so proud to be a part of, is changing how countries are viewing and ‘doing’ openness. We’ve all made a meaningful commitment – backed by tough and practical series of actions. And transparency is increasingly seen as a tangible, measureable force, with a direct impact on people’s lives. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Transparency is an idea whose time has come.”

The Malaysian government engagement with the civil society should be institutionalised and be a more formal organisation by joining OGP, with a renewed strategy and right-based approach to ensure all our country programme governance are in a consistent and coherent manner. This will serve as a filed placing for quick win, a victory for those who matter the most – the rakyat.

Datuk Sri Akhbar Satar,

President Association of Certified Fraud Examiners- Malaysia Chapter



Original Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

thirty two + = thirty nine